Call me naive, but I had this thought. If ownership knew that the Astros players had an elaborate cheating system would the players still have received their extensions? Altuve received his prior to the 2018 season and Bergman received his before 2019 as 2 big examples.
TLDR: I thought the star players on the Astros are underpaid, but maybe it’s all part of the plan
On one hand, you can see it as maybe the contracts not being crazy high because both parties knew what was going on. The thought process may have been like “we both know what’s happening behind the scenes so I’m not going to break the bank, but I’ll give you enough so it doesn’t raise suspicion and you’re not gonna be disgruntled. In the end we both get championships out of it”.
Altuve was age 27/28, coming off an MVP season (that arguably Judge should’ve won) and received a 5yr/$151MM contract (30.2 AAV) which, in my opinion, seems low. Especially when you see how much Mookie is making now over a 13 year extension (Important to note: Altuve’s 4-year bWAR average leading up to the extension was 6.3 vs Mookie’s 8.3). Altuve obviously isn’t Betts, but his prowess couldn’t get him somewhere between the extension he signed and Betts’? Maybe I’m putting too much stock into Altuve wanting to make as much money as possible.
Here’s an excerpt from an Astros blog that also agrees Altuve is underpaid, but maybe, out of the kindness of his heart, decided not the hamper the teams’ financials:
“Overall, the contract extension between Altuve and the Astros seems to be a fair deal for both parties. Altuve is likely still underpaid, in the short-term, based on his past value. There is some inherent risk for the Astros though, […] , but enough promise is there for this partnership to continue to flourish.”
Here’s another from Forbes implying that the contract is low in terms of dollars and years, but that’s probably because, at the time, teams were finally smartening up and not paying players huge contracts only for it to sour towards the end. However, the question remains: why didn’t Atluve, a Boras client, ask for more when his client was/is still in his prime? Also, if Altuve really wanted to cut the Astros some slack and maximize his earning potential, why didn’t he sign an extension with less years and leave him as a FA at 31 so he can get another $100MM contract?
Bregman was coming off a 2018 season where he was 5th in MVP voting when he signed a 5yr/$100MM extension in February 2019. The only person you can compare this contract & service time to is Mike Trout so it’s unfair to really compare the two. See Ken Rosenthal’s tweet. Bregman’s bWAR 2 years leading up to the extension was 5.7 where Trout’s was 9.7. Trout’s extension prorated to 5 years is ~$120.5MM which makes sense. In my opinion, the extension seemed low, but we’re really only talking about $5MM+ difference. Trout is undeniably the better overall player and should be making a lot more money. Also, Bregman was quoted by his father that he intends on getting another $100MM anyway. So he didn’t seem to care about maxing out his potential on this extension.
So did Altuve and Bregman leave money on the table? I think yes (moreso Altuve than Bregman).
Do I think it’s because the owners were in the loop on the cheating ring and that’s why they were able to leverage signing these two players to lower extensions than their potential? That’s complicated and there’s no real proof besides my speculation. Although, it’s hard to imagine the owner and GM not knowing about a complex cheating system taking place in your own building for more than a season (and through the playoffs).
Now on the other hand, after this past series with the Dodgers you can see the Astros offense is struggling. Altuve, Bregman, and Springer went for a combined 0 for 21. As of Friday morning, the only players hitting over .250 with more than 10 ABs are Brantley, Correa, and Maldonado (Gurriel is batting .238). Their batting stats are middle of the road when compared to the rest of the team. Now you can definitely make a case to say that 2020 is a weird year and having to stop and quarantine before restarting could definitely have an effect on their performance. I’d argue that these stars making a lot of money could have definitely found a way to stay in shape.
Here are some examples of players staying in shape. You have Joe Kelly practicing a changeup in the backyard and breaking his own window, Aroldis Chapman constantly throwing and doing some boxing, and even Freddie Freeman was taking BP from his son. Speaking of Freeman, he had dealt with a 104 degree fever in his battle with COVID-19 where he thought he was close to dying over the July 4th weekend. And yet he’s hitting .414 with a .892 OPS.
Hard to imagine that stars like Altuve and Bregman wouldn’t be able to find a way to stay in shape (both with sub .700 OPS in the young season). Now could this be because the Astro players don’t have any aide (trash can or rumored buzzers) to help them?
If the owners and GM were complicit in all of this, would they have wanted to spend large sums of money ($151mm or $100MM) on players who are now suffering without help? Why pay someone tens of millions dollars a season if they aren’t actually that good and it was the team’s resources that made them stars? On the flip-side, if Altuve and Bregman were really willing to leave money on the table then why wouldn’t the owners take that deal if they didn’t know any better? One can argue that the owners were none the wiser and thought that the team was actually playing at this elite level.
Or maybe the extensions were well worth the risk to the owners since the World Series title they aren’t being vacated. Everyone got what they wanted: the organization’s first World Series championship. With how the season is turning out to be right now, you can definitely see the owners playing innocent and put the heat on the players to prove that they are as good as their cheating seasons. You can definitely see the owners be complicit or a fool.
There are a lot of factors behind the scenes that affect contracts that we don’t have insight into like an organization’s willingness to hinder their future buying power with mega contracts or a player’s willingness to cut the organization a deal for future sustainability. It’s still early in the 60 game season, but I thought that this was interesting enough to have a discussion about. What are your thoughts?